LSAT 高级英语阅读理解

来源:LSAT    发布时间:2013-01-02    LSAT辅导视频    评论

  Session 1:
  Tales of ghosts and spiritual phenomena that make the news are usually dreamed up by country bumpkins or other people with too much time on their hands, The ghost of Missisisippi River Belle supposedly plagued a number of river boat captains on their trips down the Mississippi in the 1960s. but as with all those stories, it turns out that a couple of young hooligans were causing all the ruckus. The same is truefor crop circles that have been sprouting up in fileds cross Mississippi this year. I saw my son and a couple of his friends making the circles last night, trying to create a great “hoax”. Any reasonable preson would understand that tales of ghost throughout the country is created in the same way. not by phantasmal creatures but by juveniles looking to stir up some fun.
  Q1, The assertion of Mississsippi River Belle ghost was a hoax serves which of the following functions in the argument?
  A) It is argument of conclution.
  B) It is a piece of evidence offered in support of the conclution.
  C) It is a subsidiary conclution on which the main conclution is based.
  D) It is a reiteration of the main point for the purpose of emphasis.
  E) It is an inference from a general promise
  
  Session 2
  The current proposal to drill oil in Alaska is not the answer to our nation's oil need. The proposal supports are the notorious RefineCo and GasPump corporations that have been looking for new place to drill for past half century and have never been satisfied with the amount oil they have been able to extract, their dissatisfaction us likely to continue, so there is no reason to destroy another wildlife refuge to appease their greed.
  Q. flaw in this argument is that the author
  A) support the conclution by relying entirely on circlear argument.
  B) avoid addressing the merit of the proposal by focusing on the proposal's supporter.
  C) use emotionally charge words like notorious and greed that must never be used in an argument.
  D) assumes that there is no implication for the future in past events|考试大收集整理

  更多信息请访问:考试大LSAT网考试大LAST论坛

视频学习

我考网版权与免责声明

① 凡本网注明稿件来源为"原创"的所有文字、图片和音视频稿件,版权均属本网所有。任何媒体、网站或个人转载、链接转贴或以其他方式复制发表时必须注明"稿件来源:我考网",违者本网将依法追究责任;

② 本网部分稿件来源于网络,任何单位或个人认为我考网发布的内容可能涉嫌侵犯其合法权益,应该及时向我考网书面反馈,并提供身份证明、权属证明及详细侵权情况证明,我考网在收到上述法律文件后,将会尽快移除被控侵权内容。

最近更新

社区交流

考试问答